Election Reflection
The election of Trump has made it painfully obvious that we are living through a crisis of critical thinking. Massive segments of the electorate are utterly incapable of distinguishing between good and bad argument, reliable and unreliable data, quality and spun journalism, reality and fantasy. Droves of people are incapable of any semblance of honest self-reflection. (Are you?) Countless times I witnessed people refuse to read articles from sources they deemed “liberal” or “mainstream.” What this says is that they do not trust themselves to be able to assess the information fairly. They cannot be charitable with the views of others or do research into their reliability. They are seemingly afraid of having their minds changed. There is no doubt that a lot of it is laziness, but the echo chamber that is right-wing news is so lacking in any critical engagement that it has set up critical engagement itself as liberal. And therefore wrong and evil. It is perhaps a crisis more fundamental than anything else we face.
On the rare occasion that Trump said something resembling an argument, it was always something that appeared coherent on its face but easily crumbled after two seconds of reflection. For instance: “Hillary, you’ve been in government for 30 years. Why didn’t you stop me?” It makes some sense—assuming you don’t think about it for more than two seconds. “I am really rich, so I cannot be bought and influenced by Wall Street.” It makes some sense—assuming you don’t think about it for more than two seconds. These types of arguments won the day in our democracy. It is sobering and deeply disturbing.
Trump was true democracy in action. He was appealing to a large segment of the population that was sick and tired of evidence and argument. They didn’t want to think or be challenged. Instead, they opted for force and authoritarianism (in the spirit of the classic logical fallacies, ‘appeal to force’ and ‘argument from authority’). Arguments, so it seems, are elitist.
Whatever the future looks like, critical thinking must play a role. It must be universal. Currently, it is not.
[…] (TS) to vote differently. This guide sets aside issues of whether TS are racist, xenophobic, or ignorant and focuses only on the practical goal of changing their minds. Ostracizing them or “waiting for […]
LikeLike
[…] desperately need good media, now more than ever. Think critically about what makes good and bad media (here are a few thoughts on the issue). Spend money on the good […]
LikeLike
[…] desperately need good media, now more than ever. Think critically about what makes good and bad media (here are a few thoughts on the issue). Spend money on the […]
LikeLike
[…] The assumption that Republicans will face a voter backlash assumes also that the voters are informed on the causes. Trump and Republicans will do (and having been doing) everything they can to prevent […]
LikeLike
[…] other causal factors to Trump’s win—Clinton’s flaws, the media’s failures, Russia, Comey, lack of critical thinking, and plenty else—but in terms of the vote, it is a simple […]
LikeLike
[…] The assumption that Republicans will face a voter backlash assumes also that the voters are informed on the causes. Trump and Republicans will do (and having been doing) everything they can to prevent […]
LikeLike
[…] remotely compelling. A superficially intimidating sense of moral righteousness has replaced reasoning. The strongest support for the argument is the list of harms. There are obviously some instances in […]
LikeLike
[…] sets critical thinking, honest self-reflection, and historical perspective as the antidote. It pushes us to reevaluate our […]
LikeLike
[…] also think about the nature and character of the problems. I have suggested that we are facing a crisis of critical thinking. By this I mean that America—and, due to America’s power, the whole world—is facing dire […]
LikeLike
[…] Logic. We hold our political views because we think the arguments and evidence are on our side. So, in the discussion, we need to supply each other with our arguments and evidence. Don’t simply appeal to authorities. We all need to get better at this. […]
LikeLike
[…] the gun debate does not function through reasons or argument. This is equivalent to saying that there is no gun debate. If I’m killed in a mass shooting, I want my loved ones to recognize […]
LikeLike
[…] discourse is a swamp of poor arguments and miseducation. Dialogue between those who disagree is becoming impossible. A particular segment […]
LikeLike
[…] are the methods of philosophy? We use phrases like ‘critical thinking’ and ‘self-understanding’. The skills are general and fundamental—not tied to any specific […]
LikeLike
[…] are the methods of philosophy? We use phrases like ‘critical thinking’ and ‘self-understanding’. The skills are general and fundamental—not tied to any specific […]
LikeLike
[…] gambled that a critical mass of voters were not interested in information, argument, and competence. Simply, his approach was to treat people like they’re stupid. It […]
LikeLike
[…] themselves to keep that type of free and humanities-supporting society alive. Moreover, the current crisis of critical thinking shines a philosophical batlight upon the firmament, as if it were a call to arms for philosophers […]
LikeLike