Harry Frankfurt's essay "On Bullshit" isn't actually very good.
A different type of voter guide
When I discuss open relationships with people, after initial uneasiness, I usually hear some variation of “I don’t have any problem with open relationships as a concept. It just isn’t for me.”
I want to show why that is wrong. Open relationships are for everybody.
The words ‘clear’ and ‘unclear’ are the primary descriptive and evaluative adjectives in our philosophical discourse. They can be used in almost any context. Yet philosophers don't really know what it means.
How is it that rows of spelling children can make for entertaining television?
What does Philosophy owe society? Listen to the conversation.
What does gaslighting in the context of academic philosophy look like?